<<Believing
In A Creator Meant Rejecting My Childhood Religion>>
Dr. Gene Hwang, born in
1950 in Tainan, Taiwan, is a retired professor of mathematics at the National
Cheng University in Taiwan. He is also professor emeritus at Cornel University,
U.S.A., where he taught and did research in statistics and probability. For
years he was one of the most published authorities on statistics, a field in
which he is still involved. As a young man, he believed that life began by
evolutionary processes. But he later changed his view. He was resently
interviewed about his work and religious belief.
What
Teachings were you exposed to as a youth?
My school taught the
theory of evolution, but no one explained how life itself began. When my
parents became Taoists, I used to listen to their religious instructors and ask
them a lot of questions. But I received few answers that satisfied me.
Why
did you become a mathematician?
When I was in
elementary school, I became fascinated with mathematics. This fascination
continued when I went to university, where I especially enjoyed courses in
mathematics and probability. To me, a concise mathematical proof can be both
beautiful and elegant.
How
did you become interested in the Bible?
In 1978 my wife,
Jinghuei, began studying the Bible with Jehovah Witnesses, and occasionally I
shared in the discussions. By then, we were living in the United States.
Jinghuei had just received her doctorate in physics, and I was studying
statistics at Purdue University in Indiana.
What
did you think of the Bible?
I was impressed by its
account of how the earth was prepared for human life. The six creative periods
described in Genesis, albeit in simple language. Seemed to fit the facts—unlike
ancient mythologies. Still for many years I did not commit to belief in a
Creator.
Why
was that an issue for you?
My feelings were
involved. Beleiving in a creator meant rejecting my childhood religion, because
traditional Taoism does not teach that there is a personal God, or creator.
Later,
though, your viewpoint changed, Why was that?
The more I thought
about the origin of life, the more I became convinced that the first living
thing must have been very complex. For example, it had to be able to reproduce,
which requires genetic information and mechanism for accurately replicating
that information. Also, even the simplest living cells needs molecular machines
for building all the parts of a new cell, as well as the means to harness and
direct energy. How could such complex mechanism assemble randomly from
non-living matter? As a mathematician, I could not accept that assumption. It
asks far too much of random processes.
What
was it that moved you to examin more closely the teachings of Johavah’s
witnesses?
I have studied with the
witnesses on and off. Then, in 1995, while visiting Taiwan, I fell sick and
needed help. From the United States, my wife contacted Jehovah’s Witnesses in
Taiwan. They found me exhausted outside a hospital where there were no
available beds. One of the witnesses took me to a hotel to rest. He kept
checking on me and then took me to a clinic for treatment.
That genuine concern
deeply touched me, and I reflected on how often Jehovah’s Witnesses had shown
kindness to my family on other occasions. The Witnesses faith mad them
different. So I resumed my study of the Bible with them. The following years I
was baptized.
Does
your faith conflict with your secular studies?
Not at all in recent
years I have provided mathematical support for the scientist who study gene
function. The study of genetics provides insight into the mechanisms of life –
am insight that fills me with awe for the Creator’s wisdom.
Give
an example of that wisdom
Consider reproduction.
Some organisms, such as amoebas, don’t have male and female counterparts. These
single-cell microbes simply make a copy of their genetic information and
divide—a process called asexual reproduction. Most animals and plants, however,
reproduce sexually, combining genetic information from male and female parents.
Why is sexual reproduction remarkable?
Why would a system of
reproduction in which one organism simply divides into – and has done this very
well for who know how long—develop into a system in which two things combine to
form one? The mechanism required to take half the genetic information from the
male and half from the and female
combine them are immensely complex, presenting a huge problem to evolutionary
biologist. In my view, gender based reproduction points unequivocally to the
mind of God.
Source: www.jw.org
0 comments:
Post a Comment